4.3 Article

Seasonal variation of diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes mellitus in children worldwide

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 26, 期 7, 页码 673-678

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02743.x

关键词

children; environment; epidemiology; Type 1 diabetes

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [207008, 214111]
  2. Academy of Finland (AKA) [214111, 207008, 207008, 214111] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims To determine if there is a worldwide seasonal pattern in the clinical onset of Type 1 diabetes. Methods Analysis of the seasonality in diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes was based on the incidence data in 0- to 14-year-old children collected by the World Health Organization Diabetes Mondiale (WHO DiaMond) Project over the period 1990-1999. One hundred and five centres from 53 countries worldwide provided enough data for the seasonality analysis. The incidence seasonality patterns were also determined for age- and sex-specific groups. Results Forty-two out of 105 centres exhibited significant seasonality in the incidence of Type 1 diabetes (P < 0.05). The existence of significant seasonal patterns correlated with higher level of incidence and of the average yearly counts. The correlation disappeared after adjustment for latitude. Twenty-eight of those centres had peaks in October to January and 33 had troughs in June to August. Two out of the four centres with significant seasonality in the southern hemisphere demonstrated a different pattern with a peak in July to September and a trough in January to March. Conclusions The seasonality of the incidence of Type 1 diabetes mellitus in children under 15 years of age is a real phenomenon, as was reported previously and as is now demonstrated by this large standardized study. The seasonality pattern appears to be dependent on the geographical position, at least as far as the northern/southern hemisphere dichotomy is concerned. However, more data are needed on the populations living below the 30th parallel north in order to complete the picture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据