4.3 Article

Fatty liver is an independent risk factor for the development of Type 2 diabetes in Korean adults

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 476-481

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02410.x

关键词

fatty liver; type 2 diabetes mellitus; risk factors; ultrasonography

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims To investigate whether fatty liver per se is an independent risk factor of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Koreans. Methods We examined the clinical and laboratory data of 5372 non-diabetic participants (3670 men and 1702 women; age 46.8 +/- 8.4 years, range 20-79 years) who underwent voluntary medical check-ups in 2000 and follow-up examinations in 2005. Results Two hundred and thirty-three participants (4.3%) developed T2DM after 5 years. Univariate analysis showed that the development of diabetes was associated with: male sex; family history of diabetes; smoking; older age; higher body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hepatic enzymes, total cholesterol and triglycerides; lower HDL cholesterol; and the presence of fatty liver on ultrasonography at baseline. In multiple logistic regression models, after adjusting for age, sex and alcohol consumption, patients with fatty liver were at significantly higher risk of developing T2DM compared to those without fatty liver [relative risk (RR) 3.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.89-5.31]. After further adjustment for smoking, BMI, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, FPG, alanine aminotransferase and ultrasonographer, fatty liver remained significantly associated with the development of T2DM (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.20). Patients with moderate to severe fatty liver had higher risk ratios than patients with mild fatty liver. Exclusion of frequent drinkers did not attenuate the association. Conclusions Fatty liver on ultrasonography is associated with the development of T2DM, independently of classical risk factors, in Korean adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据