4.3 Article

Impact of 3-year lifestyle intervention on postprandial glucose metabolism: the SLIM study

期刊

DIABETIC MEDICINE
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 597-605

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02417.x

关键词

cardiovascular risk factors; impaired glucose tolerance; insulin resistance; lifestyle intervention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To determine the effect of a 3-year diet and exercise lifestyle intervention, based on general public health recommendations, on glucose tolerance, insulin resistance and metabolic cardiovascular risk factors in Dutch subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Methods The study was a randomized controlled lifestyle intervention over 3 years. A total of 147 IGT subjects (75 male, 72 female) were randomized to the intervention (INT) group or control (CON) group; 106 subjects (52 INT, 54 CON) completed 3 years of intervention. Annually, glucose, insulin and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations were determined fasting and after an oral glucose tolerance test. Measurements of body weight, serum lipids, blood pressure and maximal aerobic capacity were also performed. Results Analysis of those who completed the 3-year trial, showed that the lifestyle intervention improved body weight (INT -1.08 +/- 4.30 kg; CON +0.16 +/- 4.91 kg, P = 0.01), homeostatis model assessment index for insulin resistance and 2-h FFA. Two-hour glucose concentrations improved in the INT group, the difference being most pronounced after 1 year, with a return to baseline values after 3 years, from 8.59 +/- 1.55 to 8.55 +/- 0.34 mM; in contrast, 2-h glucose deteriorated in the CON group-from 8.46 +/- 1.84 to 9.35 +/- 2.50 mM (P = 0.02). In the INT group, diabetes incidence was reduced by 58% (P = 0.025). Conclusion Our lifestyle intervention showed a sustained beneficial effect on 2-h glucose concentrations, insulin resistance and 2-h FFA, even after 3 years. Our lifestyle intervention is effective, but for implementation more information is needed about factors influencing adherence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据