4.4 Article

Variability of body weight, pulse pressure and glycaemia strongly predict total mortality in elderly type 2 diabetic patients. The Verona Diabetes Study

期刊

DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 624-628

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.897

关键词

type 2 diabetes; elderly; glucose variability; mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Ageing is characterized by a decreased functional reserve, a concept defined as homeostenosis. We assessed the impact of long-term exposure to the average value (mean) or to the variability (coefficient of variation) of fasting glycaemia, body mass index (BMI) and pulse pressure on total mortality in a cohort of type 2 diabetic patients. Methods Fasting glycaemia, BMI and pulse pressure values were collected over a period of 3 years in 1319 type 2 diabetic patients who were subsequently followed up for 10 years. For each patient, the means and the coefficients of variation of fasting glycaemia, BMI and pulse pressure were computed. The adverse impact of these risk factors on total mortality was assessed in patients aged <65 years (n = 565) and in those aged >= 65 years (n = 754), separately. Results During the 10 years of follow-up, 438 patients died. In younger the means of fasting glycaemia [hazard ratio (HR) of III diabetic patients, tertile versus I tertile = 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-3.64], BMI (HR = 1.88, 1.12-3.14) and pulse pressure (HR = 2.36, 1.34-4.16) were independently associated with total mortality, while in older patients they were not. In contrast, the coefficients of variation of glycaemia (HR = 1.56, 1.17-2.08), BMI (HR = 1.34, 1.03-1.75) and pulse pressure (HR = 1.34, 1.03-1.74) independently predicted total mortality only in older patients. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the variability of fasting glycaemia, body weight and blood pressure (BP) is independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in older type 2 diabetic patients. Future studies are required to confirm the reproducibility of our findings. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据