4.4 Article

Diabetes Mellitus and the Occurrence of Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

期刊

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 419-427

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0263

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Recently, it has been found that diabetes patients have a higher incidence of colorectal cancer than the general population, but epidemiological studies examining a potential relationship between the two have produced inconsistent conclusions. Thus, we set out to perform a meta-analysis of cohort studies to evaluate the association between diabetes and colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods: Using diabetes,'' colorectal cancer,'' and associated key words, we performed a systematic review of published cohort studies in multiple databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge databases, OVID, CNKI, CBMD ISC, WANFANG, and CQVIP. We then applied stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify which studies to include in our analysis. STATA version 12.0 software (StataCorp., College Station, TX) was used to conduct statistical analysis, including consolidated statistics calculations, tests for heterogeneity, and publication bias evaluations. Results: We obtained a total of 532 potential articles. In accordance with our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 29 articles for the meta-analysis. The analysis of extracted information indicated that diabetes is a risk factor for the development of colorectal cancer (relative risk 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.26). Subgroup analyses by control populations, regions, gender, follow-up time, and colorectal cancer site also support this finding. Conclusions: The risk of individuals with diabetes to develop colorectal cancer is 1.22 times higher than that of individuals without diabetes. The positive association remains consistent for both men and women and for studies carried out in North America, Europe, and Asia, as well as for different follow-up times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据