4.4 Article

Comparison of gliclazide with insulin as initial treatment modality in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

期刊

DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 363-368

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2008.0045

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: This study was designed to compare effectiveness and remission rate between gliclazide and insulin as initial treatment in newly diagnosed, drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Newly diagnosed, drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes having mean fasting blood glucose >200 mg/dL were enrolled into either of two groups (gliclazide or insulin). The former received gliclazide modified-release 60 mg daily, while the insulin group received 16 units of premixed insulin as two divided doses along with medical nutrition therapy. Premeal blood glucose was monitored, and the dose was adjusted accordingly. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), lipid profile, and postmeal C-peptide were estimated at baseline and 6 months. Remission was defined as euglycemia off drug for a minimum duration of 1 month. Results: Baseline and 6-month blood glucose, HbA1c, and lipid profile were comparable between groups. Blood glucose levels normalized in 2-6 weeks in both groups. At 6 months, one of 30 (3.33%) in the gliclazide group and 24 of 30 (80%) in the insulin group were in remission. Ten of 16 (62.5%) in the insulin group and one of 20 (.5%) in the gliclazide group continued to maintain euglycemia off all pharmacological treatment at 12 months. At 6 months, C-peptide increased in the insulin group (3.21 +/- 1.61 ng/mL at baseline vs. 5.82 +/- 2.23 ng/mL at 6 months), while it remained unchanged in the gliclazide group (3.4 +/- 1.87 ng/mL at baseline vs. 3.82 +/- 1.78 ng/mL at 6 months) (P = 0.0003). Conclusions: Comparable glycemic control could be achieved with both insulin and oral hypoglycemic agent in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes subjects. Insulin treatment exceeded gliclazide in the remission (drug-free) rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据