4.5 Article

The impact of 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 on the expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 in the retinas of rats with diabetes

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 98, 期 3, 页码 474-480

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.09.028

关键词

1,25-Dihydroxy vitamin D3; Diabetic retinopathy; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Transforming growth factor-beta(1)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: To define whether 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)(2) D-3) can protect diabetic retinopathy and to investigate its impact on the expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)) in the retinas of rats with diabetes. Methods: Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were divided into normal control group, 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 group and diabetes group. The rats in 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 group and diabetes group were established to type 2 diabetes model with high-fat and high-sugar diet and streptozotocin (STZ). Meanwhile, the rats of 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 group were treated with 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3. After 13 weeks, morphological changes of retinal tissues were observed under microscopes after hematoxylin-eosin staining. VEGF and TGF-beta(1) expressions in the retinal tissues were detected with immunohistochemistry staining. Results: Pathological examination showed an appearance of edema and disordered arrangement of retinal tissues in diabetes group, but milder pathological changes in 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 group. VEGF and TGF-beta(1) expressions of both diabetes group and 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 group significantly increased (P < 0.05), but those of 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 group were significantly lower than diabetes group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: 1,25-(OH)(2) D-3 had partially protective effect on diabetic retinopathy of diabetic rats, the mechanism of which might inhibit VEGF and TGF-beta(1) expressions in the retinal tissues. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据