4.5 Article

Abnormal DNA methylation in CD4+ T cells from people with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 242-248

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.07.027

关键词

DNA methyltransferases; FOXP3; Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults; Methyl-DNA binding domain

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2009CB825605]
  2. Aid program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province [[2008] 244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aberrant DNA methylation in T cells has been linked to pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. To investigate genomic and gene-specific DNA methylation levels in CD4(+) T cells from patients with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), and to investigate changes in the expression of genes that regulate methylation as well as the autoimmune-related gene FOXP3 in these patients. Global CD4(+) T cell DNA methylation was measured in 15 LADA patients and 11 healthy controls using a methylation quantification kit. mRNA levels of DNA methytransferases (DNMTs), methyl-DNA binding domain proteins (MBDs) and FOXP3 were measured by real time PCR. Methylation of a FOXP3 regulatory element region was determined by bisulphite genomic sequencing. Genomic DNA methylation in CD4(+) T cells from LADA patients was significantly increased compared to controls. DNMT3b mRNA levels were higher in CD4(+) T cells from LADA patients than in controls. DNMT3b expression positively correlated with global DNA methylation in LADA CD4(+) T cells. FOXP3 expression was decreased, and the FOXP3 promoter region was hypermethylated in CD4(+) T cells from LADA patients compared with controls. DNA methylation levels are altered in CD4(+) T cells from LADA patients, which may contribute to disease onset and progression by affecting the expression of autoimmune-related genes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据