4.5 Article

Glucose tolerance, insulin resistance and insulin secretion in young south Indian adults: Relationships to parental size, neonatal size and childhood body mass index

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 87, 期 2, 页码 283-292

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.015

关键词

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Impaired glucose tolerance; Insulin resistance; Childhood body mass index; Young adulthood

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [RG/98001]
  2. Medical Research Council (UK)
  3. Sneha-India
  4. MRC [MC_UP_A620_1016, G0400519, MC_U147585821] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A620_1016, U1475000003, MC_U147585821, G0400519] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To study the relationship of newborn size and post-natal growth to glucose intolerance in south Indian adults. Research design and methods: 2218 men and women (mean age 28 years) were studied from a population-based birth cohort born, in a large town and adjacent rural villages. The prevalence of adult diabetes mellitus [DM] and impaired glucose tolerance [IGT], and insulin resistance and insulin secretion (calculated) were examined in relation to BMI and height at birth, and in infancy, childhood and adolescence and changes in BMI and height between these stages. Results: Sixty-two (2.8%) subjects had Type 2 diabetes (DM) and 362 (16.3%) had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). IGT and DM combined (IGT/DM) and insulin resistance were associated with low childhood body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001 for both) and above-average BMI gain between childhood or adolescence and adult life (p < 0.001 for both). There were no direct associations between birthweight or infant size and IGT/DM; however, after adjusting for adult BMI, lower birthweight was associated with an increased risk. Conclusions: The occurrence of IGT and Type 2 DM is associated with thinness at birth and in childhood followed by accelerated BMI gain through adolescence. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据