4.5 Article

Serum and intracellular magnesium deficiency in patients with metabolic syndrome-Evidences for its relation to insulin resistance

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 257-262

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.11.019

关键词

Metabolic Syndrome; Magnesium; Insulin Resistance

资金

  1. FAPESB (Research Foundation of the State of Bahia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This cross sectional study evaluated serum (SMg) and intramononuclear (MMg) magnesium in patients with metabolic syndrome without diabetes and correlated them with cardiovascular risk factors. 72 patients and 57 controls (blood donors) were studied. Hypomagnesemia (SMg < 1.7 mg/dL) was seen in 23.2% and intracellular depletion in 36.1% of the patients. SMg and MMg means were significantly lower in patients than in controls: 1.80 +/- 0.18 mg/dL vs. 2.43 +/- 0.43 mg/dL and 0.98 +/- 0.55 mu g/mg vs. 1.67 +/- 0.64 mu g/mg of protein (P < 0.001). Inverse correlation was observed between, SMg and MMg with BMI; SMg with systolic blood pressure and waist circumference in women. Patients with acanthosis nigricans had lower SMg (1.75 +/- 0.18 mg/dL vs. 1.85 +/- 0.18 mg/dL, P < 0.05). Non-white people had lower SMg (1.78 +/- 0.16 mg/dL vs. 1.92 +/- 0.24 mg/dL, P = 0.007) and MMg (0.95 +/- 0.59 mu g/mg vs. 1.13 +/- 0.42 mu g/mg, P = 0.03). Patients with IR showed lower MgM means (0.84 +/- 0.33 mu g/mg vs. 1.14 +/- 0.69 mu g/mg, P < 0.05). The same occurred in patients with low HDL-c levels (0.92 +/- 0.46 mu g/mg vs. 1.20 +/- 0.70 mu g/mg, P = 0.03), and those with moderate and severe hepatic steatosis (0.77 +/- 0.29 mu g/mg vs. 1.21 +/- 0.80 mu g/mg, P < 0.05). In conclusion, magnesium depletion in serum and mononuclear cells is common in obese people with metabolic syndrome, and it is more evident in non-white people with insulin resistance. This depletion may contribute to a post-receptor insulin resistance. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据