4.5 Article

A lack of increase in high molecular weight-adiponectin in macroalbuminuric subjects with metabolic syndrome may exert renal and atherosclerotic risks

期刊

DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 79, 期 3, 页码 503-509

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.10.011

关键词

metabolic syndrome; high molecular weight-adiponectin; macroalbuminuria; carotid atherosclerosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed serum levels of total- and HMW-adiponectin as well as carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in relation to the levels of albuminuria in subjects with and without metabolic syndrome (MS). Consecutive 291 subjects were enrolled in this study. Waist circumference (WC) was measured and MS was diagnosed according to the Japanese criteria. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) was determined, and then divided into three stages; normo-, micro- and macroalbuminuria. Of all subjects, 95 were defined as having MS (MS+) and the other 196 were not (MS-). There was no significant difference in age between MS+ and MS- groups. The prevalence of micro- and macroalbuminuria was about twice as high in the MS+ than in the MS- Although there was no difference in the WC among normo-, micro- and macroalbuminuric subjects in both MS+ and MS-, serum HMW-adiponectin levels and the HMW/total-adiponectin ratio in the macroalbuminuric MS- were significantly higher than that in the normo- and micro albuminuric MS-. However, these parameters did not change with an increase in urinary ACR among MS+. IMT was greatest in macro albuminuric MS+ when compared with other groups. Multiple regression analysis revealed that HMW/total-adiponectin ratio is associated with urinary ACR independent of age, gender and presence of MS. We concluded that increased serum HMW-adiponectin by unknown mechanisms, at abstract least independent of WC, might help protect against renal and atherosclerosis risks in macroalbuminuric MS-. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据