4.7 Review

Mortality risk with sulphonylureas compared to metformin

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 16, 期 10, 页码 885-890

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12280

关键词

metformin; sulphonylureas; type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. Cardiff University
  2. Abbott
  3. ALK
  4. Astellas
  5. Diabetes UK
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  7. EASFD
  8. Ferring
  9. GSK
  10. Jenson (Internis)
  11. Lilly
  12. Medical Research Council
  13. Medtronic
  14. MSD
  15. National Health Service
  16. Norgine
  17. Pfizer
  18. Sanofi-Aventis
  19. Shire
  20. Wyeth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current clinical guidelines in the USA and the UK recommend first-line glucose-lowering treatment with metformin monotherapy for glucose control in type 2 diabetes, where not contraindicated. Consequently, the proportion of people treated with sulphonylureas is decreasing. The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the risks and benefits associated with sulphonylurea monotherapy versus metformin monotherapy and the evidence that, in comparison with metformin, sulphonylureas cause increased harm to people with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据