4.7 Article

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 15, 期 2, 页码 112-120

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dom.12000

关键词

cardiac complications; macrovascular disease; oral pharmacological agents

资金

  1. Bristol Myers Squibb
  2. Merck
  3. Takeda
  4. Astra Zeneca
  5. Novartis A/S
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim
  7. Bristol Myers Squibb/Astra Zeneca
  8. AstraZeneca
  9. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Preliminary data from randomized trials with metabolic outcomes have shown that treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) could be associated with a reduced incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE). The present meta-analysis is aimed at verifying this protective effect, collecting all available data from randomized trials. Methods A comprehensive search for published and unpublished trials with a duration =24 weeks comparing DPP4i with placebo or other drugs was performed, retrieving all MACE reported as serious adverse events together with death from any cause. MantelHaenzel odds ratio (MHOR) was calculated with random effect models for MACE, myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality. When available, effects on glycated haemoglobin, lipid profile and blood pressure were also assessed and used for the estimation of the modification of risk for myocardial infarction using the UKPDS risk engine. Results A total of 70 trials, enrolling 41?959 patients with a mean follow-up of 44.1 weeks, was collected and included in the analysis. The MHOR (95% Confidence Interval) was 0.71[0.59;0.86], 0.64[0.44;0.94], 0.77[0.48;1.24] and 0.60[0.41;0.88] for MACE, myocardial infarction, stroke and mortality, respectively. Conclusions Treatment with DPP4i reduces the risk of cardiovascular events (particularly myocardial infarction) and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. The reduction in the incidence of myocardial infarction is greater than what predicted on the basis of conventional risk factors, suggesting a role for other mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据