4.1 Article

Preferred and Actual Location of Death: What Factors Enable a Preferred Home Death?

期刊

JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 1054-1059

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0177

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research [MOP-93711]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Fulfillment of patient preferences for location of dying is of continued end-of-life care interest. Of those voicing a preference, most prefer home. However the majority of deaths occur in an institutional setting. Objectives: The study objective was to report on the congruence between the last preferred and actual location of death among adult Nova Scotians who died from chronic disease, and to identify individual, illness-related, and environmental factors associated with achieving a preferred home death. Methods: The study employed a population-based mortality follow-back telephone survey interview. Subjects were eligible death certificate identified informants (next-of-kin) of adults (aged 18+) (n=1316) who died of advanced chronic diseases in the Canadian province of Nova Scotia between June 2009 and May 2011 who were knowledgeable about the decedent's care over the last month of life. Congruence was assessed as to whether or not the decedent died in their preferred death location. Among decedents preferring a home death, individual, illness-related, and environmental risk factor multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of home death achievement. Results: Among all who voiced a preference (n=606), 52% died in their preferred location (kappa: 0.29). Factors contributing independently to achievement of a preferred home death were emotional needs being met, nursing and family physician home visits, palliative care program involvement, and being at home for the majority of the last month. Conclusions: This study identifies elements of primary and integrated care that address the gap between preferred and actual place of care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据