4.7 Article

Glycaemic separation and risk factor control in the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial: an interim report

期刊

DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 150-156

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00933.x

关键词

blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; glycaemic control; lipids

资金

  1. Cooperative Studies Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. American Diabetes Association
  3. National Eye Institute
  4. Glaxo SmithKline
  5. Novo Nordisk
  6. Aventis
  7. Amylin
  8. Kos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial (VADT) will assess the effect of intensive (INT) vs improved standard (STD) glycaemic control on major cardiovascular (CV) events, treating other risk factors equally in both arms. Four-year results of main metabolic parameters are presented. VADT is a 7.5 years prospective randomized study of 1791 patients, 20 centres, of men and women of age 60.5 +/- 8.7 years, diagnosed for 11.5 +/- 7.5 years. Their body mass index (BMI) at baseline was 31 +/- 4 kg/m(2) and mean A1C 9.4 +/- 1.5% after maximum dose of oral agents or insulin treatment. Step treatment consists of glimepiride or metformin, rosiglitazone, insulin and other agents; A1C goals are 8-9% in STD and < 6% in INT. Lifestyle, blood pressure and lipids are treated uniformly in both arms. A1C improved in both arms. INT kept median A1C < 7% all years, A1C separation is 1.5-1.7%. From year 1 to 4, mean blood pressure is < 129/74 mmHg, similar throughout. Median LDL-C was < 97 mg/dl by year 1 and triglycerides 150 or less by 2 years. Triglycerides were lower in INT (12-16 mg/dl; p < 0.01). By 4 years, 88% are on lipid-lowering agents and 93% are on antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents. BMI is higher in INT every year (0.9-1.6 kg/m(2); p < 0.01). VADT is maintaining the expected A1C in both STD and INT, and LDL-C, triglycerides and blood pressure are at target. The trial is continuing to June 2008. It will be the first long-term completed type 2 diabetes study of the role of glycaemia on CV disease with modern treatments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据