4.7 Article

Geographical Variation in Diabetes Prevalence and Detection in China: Multilevel Spatial Analysis of 98,058 Adults

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 72-81

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc14-1100

关键词

-

资金

  1. China National Science and Technology Pillar Program from Ministry of Science and Technology [2013BAI04B02]
  2. Science and Technology Outstanding Program for Scholars Coming Back from Overseas from the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security
  3. Key Laboratory for Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases of the Ministry of Health [1994DP131044]
  4. National Key New Drug Creation and Manufacturing Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology [2012ZX09303006-001]
  5. National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases of the Ministry of Health [2013BAI09B13]
  6. Australia-China Science and Research Fund [ACSRF17120]
  7. National Heart Foundation of Australia
  8. FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL CENTER [D43TW009107] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To investigate the geographic variation in diabetes prevalence and detection in China. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Self-report and biomedical data were collected from 98,058 adults aged >= 18 years (90.5% response) from 162 areas spanning mainland China. Diabetes status was assessed using American Diabetes Association criteria. Among those with diabetes, detection was defined by prior diagnosis. Choropleth maps were used to visually assess geographical variation in each outcome at the provincial level. The odds of each outcome were assessed using multilevel logistic regression, with adjustment for person-and area-level characteristics. RESULTS Geographic visualization at the provincial level indicated widespread variation in diabetes prevalence and detection across China. Regional prevalence adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) ranged from 8.3% (95% CI 7.2%, 9.7%) in the northeast to 12.7% (11.1%, 14.6%) in the north. A clear negative gradient in diabetes prevalence was observed from 13.1%(12.0%, 14.4%) in the urban high-SEC to 8.7% (7.8%, 9.6%) in rural low-SEC counties/districts. Adjusting for health literacy and other person-level characteristics only partially attenuated these geographic variations. Only one-third of participants living with diabetes had been previously diagnosed, but this also varied substantively by geography. Regional detection adjusted for age, sex, and urban/rural SEC, for example, spanned from 40.4% (34.9%, 46.3%) in the north to 15.6% (11.7%, 20.5%) in the southwest. Compared with detection of 40.8% (37.3%, 44.4%) in urban high-SEC counties, detection was poorest among rural low-SEC counties at just 20.5% (17.7%, 23.7%). Person-level characteristics did not fully account for these geographic variations in diabetes detection. CONCLUSIONS Strategies for addressing diabetes risk and improving detection require geographical targeting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据