4.7 Article

Empagliflozin as Add-on to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes A 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 36, 期 11, 页码 3396-3404

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2673

关键词

-

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. AstraZeneca
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  4. Eli Lilly and Company
  5. Merck Sharp Dohme
  6. Novo Nordisk
  7. Roche Pharma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVETo investigate the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSPatients inadequately controlled on metformin and sulfonylurea (HbA(1c) 7 to 10%) were randomized and treated with once-daily empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 225), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 216), or placebo (n = 225) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA(1c) at week 24. Key secondary end points were changes from baseline in weight and mean daily glucose (MDG) at week 24.RESULTSAt week 24, adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in HbA(1c) were -0.17% (0.05) for placebo vs. -0.82% (0.05) and -0.77% (0.05) for empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (both P < 0.001). Empagliflozin significantly reduced MDG, weight, and systolic (but not diastolic) blood pressure versus placebo. Adverse events were reported in 62.7, 67.9, and 64.1% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively. Events consistent with urinary tract infection were reported in 8.0, 10.3, and 8.3% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (females: 13.3, 18.0, and 17.5%, respectively; males: 2.7, 2.7, and 0%, respectively). Events consistent with genital infection were reported in 0.9, 2.7, and 2.3% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (females: 0.9, 4.5, and 3.9%, respectively; males: 0.9% in each group).CONCLUSIONSEmpagliflozin 10 and 25 mg for 24 weeks as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea improved glycemic control, weight, and systolic blood pressure and were well tolerated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据