4.7 Article

Inpatient Diabetes Education Is Associated With Less Frequent Hospital Readmission Among Patients With Poor Glycemic Control

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 2960-2967

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0108

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K23-DK-080891-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVETo explore the relationship between inpatient diabetes education (IDE) and hospital readmissions in patients with poorly controlled diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSPatients with a discharge diagnosis of diabetes (ICD-9 code 250.x) and HbA(1c) >9% who were hospitalized between 2008 and 2010 were retrospectively identified. All-cause first readmissions were determined within 30 days and 180 days after discharge. IDE was conducted by a certified diabetes educator or trainee. Relationships between IDE and hospital readmission were analyzed with stepwise backward logistic regression models.RESULTSIn all, 2,265 patients were included in the 30-day analysis and 2,069 patients were included in the 180-day analysis. Patients who received IDE had a lower frequency of readmission within 30 days than did those who did not (11 vs. 16%; P = 0.0001). This relationship persisted after adjustment for sociodemographic and illness-related factors (odds ratio 0.66 [95% CI 0.51-0.85]; P = 0.001). Medicaid insurance and longer stay were also independent predictors in this model. IDE was also associated with reduced readmissions within 180 days, although the relationship was attenuated. In the final 180-day model, no IDE, African American race, Medicaid or Medicare insurance, longer stay, and lower HbA(1c) were independently associated with increased hospital readmission. Further analysis determined that higher HbA(1c) was associated with lower frequency of readmission only among patients who received a diabetes education consult.CONCLUSIONSFormal IDE was independently associated with a lower frequency of all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days; this relationship was attenuated by 180 days. Prospective studies are needed to confirm this association.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据