4.7 Article

Analysis of Glucose Responses to Automated Insulin Suspension With Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1462-1465

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-0052

关键词

-

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation postdoctoral fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-The advent of sensor-augmented pump therapy with a low-glucose suspend (LGS) function (Medtronic Paradigm Veo System), allowing insulin to be automatically suspended for up to 2 h when sensor glucose falls below a preset threshold, has the potential to reduce the duration of hypoglycemia. In this article, we analyzed blood glucose profiles following a full 2-h insulin suspension activated by the LGS function, as well as examined different patterns of use among patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Data from a cohort of participants using the Veo System for up to 6 months were analyzed to determine the time and duration of insulin suspension activated by the LGS function. We further evaluated overnight suspend events with no patient response occurring prior to 3:00 A.M., which allowed us to determine the pattern of sensor glucose values with no patient intervention during and after the period of insulin suspension. RESULTS-There were 3,128 LGS events during the 2,493 days evaluated. The median duration was 11.2 min, and 36% of events occurred overnight. There were 126 full 2-h suspend events that occurred overnight with no patient response, occurring before 3:00 A.M. For these events, the mean sensor glucose at the end of the 2-h suspend period was 99 +/- 6 mg/dL ([means +/- SE] 5.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/L). The mean sensor glucose 2 h after insulin delivery resumed was 155 +/- 10 mg/dL (8.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/L). There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis. CONCLUSIONS-Analyses of sensor glucose patterns following insulin suspension activated by LGS suggest that this technology is safe and unlikely to be associated with adverse outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据