4.7 Article

Phase 1 (Safety) Study of Autologous Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells in Type 1 Diabetic Patients

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 34, 期 9, 页码 2026-2032

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-0472

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R33-DK-63499-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-The safety of dendritic cells to selectively suppress autoimmunity, especially in type 1. diabetes, has never been ascertained. We investigated the safety of autologous dendritic cells, stabilized into an immunosuppressive state, in established adult type 1 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-A randomized, double-blind, phase I study was conducted. A total of 10, otherwise generally healthy, insulin-requiring type 1 diabetic patients between 18 and 60 years of age, without any other known or suspected health conditions, received autologous dendritic cells, unmanipulated or engineered ex vivo toward an immunosuppressive state. Ten million cells were administered intradermally in the abdomen once every 2 weeks for a total of four administrations. The primary end point determined the proportion of patients with adverse events on the basis of the physician's global assessment, hematology, biochemistry, and immune monitoring for a period of 12 months. RESULTS-The dendritic cells were safely tolerated. There were no discernible adverse events in any patient throughout the study. Other than a significant increase in the frequency of peripheral B220+ CD11c(-) B cells, mainly seen in the recipients of engineered dendritic cells during the dendritic cell administration period, there were no statistically relevant differences in other immune populations or biochemical, hematological, and immune biomarkers compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS-Treatment with autologous dendritic cells, in a native state or directed ex vivo toward a tolerogenic immunosuppressive state, is safe and well tolerated. Dendritic cells upregulated the frequency of a potentially beneficial B220+CD11c(-)B-cell population, at least in type 1 diabetes autoimmunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据