4.7 Article

Liver ATP Synthesis Is Lower and Relates to Insulin Sensitivity in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 448-453

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1076

关键词

-

资金

  1. Austrian Science Foundation [P15656]
  2. Austrian National Bank [OENB 11459]
  3. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Lilly grants
  6. German Research Foundation
  7. [SFB575]
  8. [13]
  9. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P15656] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-Steatosis associates with insulin resistance and may even predict type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular complications. Because muscular insulin resistance relates to myocellular fat deposition and disturbed energy metabolism, we hypothesized that reduced hepatic ATP turnover (fATP) underlies insulin resistance and elevated hepatocellular lipid (NCO contents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-We measured hepatic [ATP using P-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy in patients with type 2 diabetes and age- and body mass matched controls. Peripheral (M and M/I) and hepatic (suppression of endogenous glucose production) insulin sensitivity were assessed with euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamps. RESULTS-Diabetic individuals had 29% and 28% lower peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity as well as 42% reduced fATP than controls. After adjusting for HCL, fATP correlated positively with peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity but negatively with waist circumference, BMI, and fasting plasma glucose. Multiple regression analysis identified waist circumference as an independent predictor of fATP and inorganic phosphate (P-1) concentrations, explaining 65% (P = 0.001) and 56% (P = 0.003) of the variations. Hepatocellular P-1 primarily determined the alterations in fATP. CONCLUSIONS-In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance relates to perturbed hepatic energy metabolism, which is at least partly accounted for by fat depots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据