4.7 Article

Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR 3) Study

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 2403-2405

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc11-1248

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medtronic
  2. Abbott Diabetes Care
  3. Amylin
  4. Bayer
  5. Calibra
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Intarcia
  8. Mann Kind
  9. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.
  10. Novo Nordisk
  11. Pfizer
  12. ResMed
  13. Roche
  14. sanofi-aventis
  15. Blodel
  16. Hygieia
  17. Intuity
  18. Life Scan
  19. United Health Group
  20. Valeritas
  21. Biodel
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Becton Dickinson
  24. Hoffmann La Roche
  25. GlycoMark
  26. Wyeth
  27. Daiichi Sankyo
  28. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  29. Bayhill Therapeutics
  30. LipoScience
  31. MannKind
  32. MicroIslet
  33. Exsulin
  34. GI Dynamics
  35. Lilly
  36. Novartis
  37. Tolerex
  38. Osiris
  39. Halozyme
  40. Interkrin
  41. Merck
  42. Dexcom
  43. Johnson Johnson
  44. Fujisawa
  45. Boehringer Ingelheim

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-To examine the effects of crossing over from optimized multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy to sensor-augmented pump (SAP) therapy for 6 months, and the effects of 18 months' sustained use of SAP. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-The 6-month, single-crossover continuation phase of Sensor-Augmented Pump Therapy for A1C Reduction (STAR 3) provided SAP therapy to 420 subjects who completed the 1-year randomized study. The primary outcome was change in A1C in the crossover group. RESULTS-A1C values were initially lower in the continuing-SAP group than in the crossover group (7.4 vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001). A1C values remained reduced in the SAP group. After 3 months on the SAP system, A1C decreased to 7.6% in the crossover group (P < 0.001); this was a significant and sustained decrease among both adults and children (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS-Switching from optimized MDI to SAP therapy allowed for rapid and safe A1C reductions. Glycemic benefits of SAP therapy persist for at least 18 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据