4.7 Article

Cohort Study of Pioglitazone and Cancer Incidence in Patients With Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 923-929

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1067

关键词

-

资金

  1. Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
  2. Takeda
  3. Eli Lilly and Co.
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Merck
  6. Genentech (Roche)
  7. sanofi-aventis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-To explore whether treatment with pioglitazone was associated with risk of incident cancer at the 10 most common sites (prostate, female breast, lung/bronchus, endometrial, colon, non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL], pancreas, kidney/renal pelvis, rectal, and melanoma). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-A cohort study of 252,467 patients aged >= 40 years from the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry was conducted. All prescriptions for diabetes medications were identified by pharmacy records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between risk of incident cancer and ever use, duration, dose, and time since initiation of pioglitazone (modeled as time-dependent variables). RESULTS-In models adjusted for age, sex, year of cohort entry, race/ethnicity, income, smoking, glycemic control, diabetes duration, creatinine levels, congestive heart failure, and use of other diabetes medications, the hazard ratio (HR) for each cancer associated with ever use of pioglitazone ranged from 0.7 to 1.3, with all 95% CIs including 1.0. There was a suggestion of an increased risk of melanoma (HR 1.3 [95% CI 0.9-2.0]) and NHL (1.3 [1.0-1.8]) and a decreased risk or kidney/renal pelvis cancers (0.7 [0.4-1.1] associated with ever use of pioglitazone. These associations were unaltered with increasing dose, duration, or time since first use. CONCLUSIONS-We found no clear evidence of an association between use of pioglitazone and risk of the incident cancers examined. Because the maximum duration of follow-up was fewer than 6 years after the initiation of pioglitazone, longer-term studies are needed. Diabetes Care 34:923-929, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据