4.7 Article

Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema (RESOLVE Study)

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 2399-2405

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0493

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma
  2. Novartis
  3. Allergan
  4. Pfizer
  5. Solvay

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE- The expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is elevated in diabetic macular edema (DME). Ranibizumab binds to and inhibits multiple VEGF variants. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ranibizumab in DME involving the foveal center. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- This was a 12-month, multicenter, sham-controlled, double-masked study with eyes (age >18 years, type 1 or 2 diabetes, central retinal thickness [CRT] >= 300 mu m, and best corrected visual acuity [BCVA] of 73-39 ETDRS letters [Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study]) randomly assigned to intravitreal ranibizumab (0.3 or 0.5 mg; n = 51 each) or sham (n = 49). The treatment schedule comprised three monthly injections, after which treatment could be stopped/reinitiated with an opportunity for rescue laser photocoagulation (protocol-defined criteria). After month 1, dose-doubling was permitted (protocol-defined criteria, injection volume increased from 0.05 to 0.1 ml and remained at 0.1 ml thereafter). Efficacy (BCVA and CRT) and safety were compared between pooled ranibizumab and sham arms using the full analysis set (n = 151, patients receiving >= 1 injection). RESULTS- At month 12, mean +/- SD BCVA improved from baseline by 10.3 +/- 9.1 letters with ranibizumab and declined by 1.4 +/- 14.2 letters with sham (P < 0.0001). Mean CRT reduction was 194.2 +/- 135.1 mu m with ranibizumab and 48.4 +/- 153.4 mu m with sham (P < 0.0001). Gain of >= 10 letters BCVA from baseline occurred in 60.8% of ranibizumab and 18.4% of sham eyes (P < 0.0001). Safety data were consistent with previous studies of intravitreal ranibizumab. CONCLUSIONS- Ranibizumab is effective in improving BCVA and is well tolerated in DME. Future clinical trials are required to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据