4.7 Article

Smoking and Risk for Diabetes Incidence and Mortality in Korean Men and Women

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 2567-2572

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-0261

关键词

-

资金

  1. Seoul City Research and Business Development program Seoul Korea [10526]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Mounting evidence suggests that smoking is a cause of type 2 diabetes We explored the association of cigarette smoking with diabetes incidence and mortality in a large cohort of Koreans RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A 14 year prospective cohort study was performed on 1 236 443 Korean men and women aged 30-95 years at baseline who underwent standardized biennial medical examinations provided by the National Health Insurance Corporation (NHIC) Incident diabetes was identified on the basis of outpatient visits hospitalization or prescription medication treatment for diabetes as captured in the NHIC database Diabetes mortality was obtained through the national statistical office Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate associations of smoking with indicators of diabetes and diabetes mortality RESULTS - Smoking was significantly associated with increased risk for diabetic outpatient treatment hospitalization and mortality among both men and women and the risk among current smokers increased modestly with the number of cigarettes smoked daily (P-trend < 0 0001 for all associations) Compared with never smokers current male smokers who smoked >= 20 cigarettes/day had increased risk for incident diabetes defined by outpatient treatment (adjusted hazard ratio 1 55 11 51-1 601) incident diabetes defined by >= 3 prescription medications for diabetes (1 71 [1 63-1 80]) and death from diabetes (1 60 [1 25-2 06]) The risks for outpatient treatment among smokers were higher in men than in women with evidence for effect modification by sex and age (P-interaction < 0 0001) CONCLUSIONS - Our study provides longitudinal evidence that smoking increases the risk of incident diabetes and mortality

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据