4.7 Article

A1C and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes A nested case-control study

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 77-83

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1318

关键词

-

资金

  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America
  2. Pharmacy Analytical Services, KPSC
  3. University of Southern California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE- Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The role of aggressive glycemic control in preventing cardiovascular events is unclear. A nested case-control study design was used to evaluate the association between average A1C and cardiovascular outcomes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- Adults with type 2 diabetes were identified among members of Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Type 2 diabetes was identified based on ICD-9 diagnosis codes and either A1C >7.5% or prescriptions for hypoglycemic agents. Case subjects were defined based on nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death attributed to cardiovascular events during a 3-year window. Four type 2 diabetes control subjects were matched to each case subject based on age, sex, and index date for the corresponding case. A conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio of cardiovascular events and compare three patient groups based on average A1C measured in the preindex period >6-8, >8%). RESULTS- A total of 44,628 control subjects were matched to 11,157 case subjects. Patients with an average A1C <= 6% were 20% more likely to experience a cardiovascular event than the group with an average A1C of >6-8% (P < 0.0001). Patients with an average A1C >8% experienced a 16% increase in the likelihood of a cardiovascular event (P < 0.0001). We found evidence of statistical interaction with A1C category and LDL level (P = 0.0002), use of cardiovascular medications (P = 0.02), and use of antipsychotics (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS- High-risk patients with type 2 diabetes who achieved mean A1C levels of <= 6% or failed to decrease their A1C to <8% are at increased risk for cardiovascular events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据