4.7 Article

Metabolic Risk and Health Behaviors in Minority Youth at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 193-197

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1197

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01-NR-008244]
  2. NIH National Center for Research Resources/Clinical and Translational Science [1UL1-RR-024139-01]
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024139] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH [R01NR008244] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE- The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of sex and race/ethnicity on metabolic risk and health behaviors in minority youth. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- A total of 173 seventh graders (46% male and 54% female; 49% Hispanic and 51% African American) with BMI >= 85th percentile and a family history of diabetes were assessed with weight, height, BMI, percent body fat, and waist circumference measures. Laboratory indexes included 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests with insulin levels at 0 and 2 h, fasting A1C, and lipids. Insulin resistance was estimated by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). Youth also completed questionnaires evaluating health behaviors. RESULTS- Average BMI (31.6 +/- 6.4 kg/m(2)) and percent body fat (39.5 +/- 10.6%) were high. All participants demonstrated insulin resistance with elevated HOMA-IR values (8.5 +/- 5.2). Compared with African American youth, Hispanic youth had higher triglycerides and lower HDL cholesterol despite similar BMI. Hispanic youth reported lower self-efficacy for diet, less physical activity, and higher total fat intake. Male youth had higher glucose (0 and 2 h) and reported more physical activity, more healthy food choices, and higher calcium intake than female youth. CONCLUSIONS Screening high-risk youth for insulin resistance and lipid abnormalities is recommended. Promoting acceptable physical activities and healthy food choices may be especially important for Hispanic and female youth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据