4.7 Article

Fetuses of Obese Mothers Develop Insulin Resistance in Utero

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 32, 期 6, 页码 1076-1080

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-2077

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HD 22965]
  2. CRU NCRR CTSA [UL1 RR 024989]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Offspring of obese mothers have an increased risk for obesity and diabetes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether fetuses of obese women have increased obesity, insulin resistance, and markers of inflammation, supporting the concept of fetal programming. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Fifty-three lean and 68 obese women with singleton term pregnancies were evaluated at elective cesarean delivery. Maternal and umbilical cord blood was obtained for measures of insulin resistance and cytokines. Neonatal body composition was estimated using anthropometric measurements within 24 h of delivery. RESULTS - The fetuses of obese mothers had greater percent body fat (13.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 11.6 +/- 2.9%, P = 0.02), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (1.51 +/- 0.86 vs. 1.06 +/- 0.70, P = 0.003), cord leptin (14.5 +/- 13.5 vs. 8.2 +/- 4.7 ng/ml, P = 0.001), and interleukin-6 (3.5 +/- 2.3 Vs. 2.4 +/- 1.4 pg/ml, P = 0.02) than fetuses of lean women. There was a strong positive correlation between fetal adiposity and insulin resistance (r = 0.32, P = 0.0008) as well as maternal pregravid BMI and fetal insulin resistance (r = 0.31, P = 0.007) even with adjustment for potential confounders. Cord leptin had a significant correlation with fetal insulin resistance (r = 0.30, P = 0.001), but there was no significant correlation between any other umbilical cord cytokines and fetal insulin resistance. CONCLUSIONS - These data suggest that maternal obesity creates a significant risk for the next generations with metabolic compromise already apparent at birth. Therefore, if prevention of obesity is the goal rather than treatment, the perinatal period may be an important focus of future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据