4.7 Article

Primary Graft Function, Metabolic Control, and Graft Survival After Islet Transplantation

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 32, 期 8, 页码 1473-1478

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1685

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To investigate the influence of primary graft function (PGF) on graft survival and metabolic control after islet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 14 consecutive patients with brittle type 1 diabetes were enrolled in this phase 2 study, and received median 12,479 islet equivalents per kilogram of body weight (interquartile range 11,072-15,755) in two or three sequential infusions within 67 days (44-95). PGF was estimated I month alter the last infusion by the beta-score, a previously validated index (range 0-8) based on insulin or oral treatment requirements, plasma C-peptide, blood glucose, and A1C. Primary outcome was graft survival, defined as insulin independence with A1C <= 6.5%. RESULTS - All patients gained insulin independence within 12 days (6-23) after the last infusion. PGF was optimal (beta-score >= 7) in nine patients and suboptimal (beta-score <= 6) in five. At last follow-up, 3.3 years (2.8-4.0) after islet transplantation, eight patients (57%) remained insulin independent with A1C <= 6.5%, including seven patients with optimal PGF (78%) and one with suboptimal PGF (20%) (P = 0.01, log-rank test). Graft survival was not significantly influenced by HLA mismatches or by preexisting islet autoantibodies. A1C, mean glucose, glucose variability (assessed with continuous glucose monitoring system), and glucose tolerance (using an oval glucose tolerance test) were markedly improved when compared with baseline values and were significantly lower in patients with optimal PGF than in those with suboptimal PGF. CONCLUSIONS - Optimal PGF vas associated With prolonged graft survival and better metabolic control after islet transplantation. This early outcome may represent a valuable end point in future clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据