4.7 Article

History of Foot Ulcer Increases Mortality Among Individuals With Diabetes Ten-year follow-up of the Nord-Trondelag Health Study, Norway

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 32, 期 12, 页码 2193-2199

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-0651

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bergen University College
  2. Norwegian Diabetes Association and GlaxoSmithKline Norway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To compare mortality rates for individuals with diabetes with and without a history of foot ulcer (HFU) and with that for the nondiabetic population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This population-based study included 155 diabetic individuals with an HFU, 1,339 diabetic individuals without an HFU, and 63,632 nondiabetic individuals who were all followed for 10 years with mortality as the end point. RESULTS - During the follow-up period, a total of 49.0% of diabetic individuals with an HFU died, Compared With 35.2% of diabetic individuals without an HFU and 10.5% of those without diabetes. in Cox regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, education, current smoking, and waist circumference, having an HFU was associated with more than a twofold (2.29 [95% CI 1.82-2.88]) hazard risk for mortality compared with that of the nondiabetic group. In corresponding analyses comparing diabetic individuals with and without an HFU, an HFU was associated with 47% increased mortality (1.47 [1.14-1.89]). Significant covariates were older age, male sex, and current smoking, After inclusion of A1C, insulin use, microalbuminuria, cardiovascular disease, and depression scores in the model, each was significantly related to life expectancy. CONCLUSIONS - AN HFU increased mortality risk among community-dwelling adults and elderly individuals with diabetes. The excess risk persisted after adjustment for comorbidity and depression scores, indicating that close clinical monitoring might be warranted among individuals with an HFU, who may be particularly vulnerable to adverse outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据