4.7 Article

Dietary Patterns and Risk for Diabetes The Multiethnic Cohort

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 532-538

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1621

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute [R37-CA-54281]
  2. DAMD [17-94-T-4184]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [R21-DK-073816]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - The high diabetes incidence among Japanese Americans and Native Hawaiians cannot be explained by BMI. Therefore, we examined the influence Of three dietary patterns of fat and meat, vegetables, and fruit and milk on diabetes risk in the Hawaii component of the Multiethnic Cohort with 29,759 Caucasians, 35,244 Japanese Americans, and 10,509 Native Hawaiians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Subjects aged 45-75 years completed a baseline food frequency questionnaire. After.] 4 years of follow-up, 8,587 subjects with incident diabetes were identified through self-reports or health plan linkages. Risk was assessed using Cox regression stratified by age and adjusted for ethnicity, BMI, physical activity, education, total energy, smoking, alcohol intake, marital status, and hypertension. RESULTS - Fat and meat was significantly associated With diabetes risk in men (hazard ratio 1.40 [95% Cl 1.23-1.60], P-trend < 0.0001) and women (1.22 [1.06-1.40], P-trend = 0.004) when extreme quintiles were compared. Except in Hawaiian women, the magnitude Of the risk was similar across ethnic groups although not always significant. After stratification by BMI, fat and meat remained a predictor of disease primarily among overweight men and among overweight Japanese women. Vegetables lowered diabetes risk in men (0.86 [0.77-0.95], P-trend = 0.004) but not in women, whereas fruit and milk seemed to be more beneficial in women (0.85 [0.76-0.96], P-trend = 0.005) than in men (0.92 [0.83-1.02], P-trend = 0.04), CONCLUSIONS - Foods high in meat and fat appear to confer a higher diabetes risk in all ethnic groups, whereas the effects of other dietary patterns vary by sex and ethnicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据