4.7 Article

A1C and Diabetes Diagnosis: The Rancho Bernardo Study

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 101-103

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc09-1366

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging [AG07181, AG028507]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK31801]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) Brazil
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK031801] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R37AG007181, R01AG028507, R01AG007181] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To examine the sensitivity and specificity of A1C as a diagnostic Lest for type 2 diabetes in older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults without known diabetes who had an oral glucose tolerance test and A I C measured on the same day. RESULTS - Mean age of the 2,107 participants was 69.4 +/- 11.1 years; 43% were men. Based on the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria, 198 had previously undiagnosed type 2 diabetes. The sensitivity/specificity of A1C cut point of 6.5% was 44/79%. Results were similar in age- and sex-stratified analyses. Given the A1C cut point of 6.5%, 85% of participants were classified as nondiabetic by ADA criteria. CONCLUSIONS - The limited sensitivity of the A1C test may result in delayed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, while the strict use of ADA criteria may fail to identify a high proportion of individuals with diabetes by A1C >= 6.5% or retinopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据