期刊
DIABETES CARE
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 559-566出版社
AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-0787
关键词
-
资金
- Commonwealth Fund
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [R21 HS014864, R18 HS17261]
- California Endowment
- San Francisco Department of Public Health
- California Healthcare Foundation
- National Institutes of Health [K-23 RR16539, UL1 RR024131]
OBJECTIVE - Despite the importance of self-management support (SMS), few Studies have compared SMS interventions, involved diverse populations, or entailed implementation in safety net settings. We examined the effects of two SMS Strategies across outcomes corresponding to the Chronic Care Model. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A total of 339 outpatients with poorly controlled diabetes from county-run clinics were enrolled in a three-arm trial. Participants, more than half of whom spoke limited English, were uninsured, and/or had less than -,I high school education, were random]), assigned to usual care, interactive weekly automated telephone self-management support with nurse follow-up (ATSM), or monthly group medical visits with physician and health educator facilitation (GMV). We measured I-year changes in Structure (Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care [PACIC]), communication processes (Interpersonal Processes of Care [IPC]). and Outcomes (behavioral, functional, and Metabolic). RESULTS - Compared with the usual care group, the ATSM and GMV groups showed improvements in PACIC, With effect sizes of 0.48 and 0.50, respectively (P < 0,01). Only the ATSM group showed Improvements in IPC (effect sizes 0.40 vs usual care and 0.25 vs. GMV, p < 0.05). Both SMS arms showed improvements in self-management behavior versus the usual care arm (P < 0.05), with gains being greater for the ATSM group than for the GMV group (effect size 0.27, P = 0.02). The ATSM group had Fewer bed days per month than the usual care group (-1.7 days, P = 0.05) and the GMV group (-2.3 days, P < 0.01) and less interference with daily activities (ban the usual care group (odds ratio 0.37, P = 0.02). We observed no differences in A1C change. CONCLUSIONS - Patient-centered SMS improves certain aspects of diabetes care and positively influences self-management behavior. ATSM seems to be a more effective communication vehicle than GMV in Improving behavior and quality of life.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据