4.7 Article

Recurrence of Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Epidemiology and risk factors

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 2154-2159

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1013

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian National Institute of Health
  2. Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists
  3. DAI Study Group

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - The purpose of this study was to assess incidence of and risk factors for recurrent cardiovascular disease (CVD) in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We estimated the incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients, aged 40-97 years, followed by a network of diabetes clinics. The analysis was conducted separately for 2,788 patients with CVD at enrollment (cohort A) and for 844 patients developing the first episode during the observation period (cohort B). RESULTS - During 4 years of follow-up, in cohort A the age-adjusted incidence of a recurrent event (per 1,000 person-years) was 72.7 (95% CI 58.3-87.1) in men and 32.5 (21.2-43.7) in women, whereas in cohort B it was 40.1 (17.4-62.9) in men and 22.4 (12.9-32.0) in women. After controls were included for potential predictors (familial CVD, obesity, smoking, diabetes duration, glycemic control, microvascular complications, geographic area, and antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment), male sex, older age, and insulin use were significant independent risk predictors (cohort A) and serum triglyceride levels >= 1.69 mmol/l emerged as the only metabolic (negative) prognostic factor (cohort B). in both cohorts, a prior CVD episode, especially myocardial infarction, was by far the strongest predictor of recurrent CVD. CONCLUSIONS - Approximately 6% of unselected diabetic patients in secondary prevention develop recurrent major CVD every year. Those with long-standing previous CVD show a higher incidence of recurrence. Male sex, age, high triglyceride levels, and insulin use are additional predictors of recurrence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据