4.7 Article

Clinical Heterogeneity in Patients With FOXP3 Mutations Presenting With Permanent Neonatal Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 111-116

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1188

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [067463/Z/2/Z]
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS CM06/00013]
  3. Czech Ministry of Education [021620819]
  4. Czech Ministry of Health [64203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX) syndrome is caused by FOXP3 mutations. We aimed to determine the prevalence, genetics, and clinical phenotype of FOXP3 mutations in a large cohort with permanent neonatal diabetes (PNDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The 11 coding exons and the polyadenylation region of FOXP3 Were sequenced in 26 male subjects with diabetes diagnosed before 6 months of age in whom common genetic causes of PNDM had been excluded. Ten subjects had at least one additional immune-related disorder, and the remaining 16 had isolated diabetes. RESULTS - We identified four hemizygous FOXP3 Mutations in 6 of 10 patients with associated immune-related disorders and in 0 of 16 patients with isolated diabetes (P = 0.002). Three patients with two novel mutations (R337Q and P339A) and the previously reported L76QfsX53 developed classic IPEX syndrome and died within the First, 13 months. The novel mutation V408M was found in three patients from two unrelated families and had a mild phenotype with hypothyroidism and autoimmune enteropathy (it = 2) or nephrotic syndrome (n = 1) and survival to 12-15 years. CONCLUSIONS - FOXP3 mutations result in similar to 4% of cases of male patients with permanent diabetes diagnosed before 6 months. Patients not only have classic IPEX syndrome but, unexpectedly. may have a more benign phenotype. FOXP3 sequencing should be performed in any male patient with the diagnosis of diabetes in the first 6 months who develops other possible autoimmune-associated conditions, even in the absence of full IPEX syndrome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据