4.6 Article

Type 1 diabetes control and pregnancy outcomes in women treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine-MDI)

期刊

DIABETES & METABOLISM
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 426-431

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2011.02.002

关键词

Type 1 diabetes; Pregnancy; Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; Multiple daily injections; Glargine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim. - The best way to treat pregnant patients who have type 1 diabetes is still unclear. For this reason, the present study compared metabolic control and maternal-fetal outcomes in patients treated with continuous subcutaneous infusions of rapid-acting insulin analogues (CSII) or with insulin glargine and multiple daily injections of rapid-acting insulin analogues (glargine-MDI). Methods. - This retrospective multicentre study involved 144 women with type I diabetes, 100 of whom were using CSII and 44 glargine-MDI. Outcomes analyzed were metabolic control, diabetes complications, pregnancy outcome, perinatal morbidity and mortality, and fetal malformations. Results. - The two groups were comparable for age, prepregnancy BMI, primiparous rate and diabetes complications, although patients using CSII had longer duration of diabetes (P = 0.03) and higher White classifications (P = 0.04). In both groups, metabolic control improved during pregnancy, but good control was reached earlier among patients using CSII. At parturition, patients using CSII had lower HbA(1c) (6.2 +/- 0.7% vs 6.5 0.8%; P = 0.02) and required less insulin (P < 0.01). Weight gain was similar in both groups, and maternal-fetal outcomes did not differ. Conclusion. - In pregnant patients with type 1 diabetes, MDI and CSII are equivalent in terms of metabolic control and fetal-maternal outcomes, although patients using CSII achieved good control earlier and with less insulin. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据