4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Mechanisms of early improvement resolution of type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery

期刊

DIABETES & METABOLISM
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 518-523

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/S1262-3636(09)73459-7

关键词

Bariatric surgery; Type 2 diabetes; Insulin sensitivity; Insulin secretion; Review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bariatric surgery represents the main option for obtaining substantial and long-term weight loss in morbidly obese subjects In addition, malabsorptive (biliopancreatic diversion, BPD) and restrictive (roux-en-Y gastric bypass. RYGB) surgery. originally devised to treat obesity, hits also been shown to help diabetes. Indeed. type 2 diabetes is improved or even reversed soon after these operations and well before significant weight loss occurs Two hypotheses have been proposed to explain the early effects of bariatric surgery on diabetes-namely. the hind-ut hypothesis and the foregut hypothesis The former states that diabetes control results from the more rapid delivery of nutrients to the distal small intestine. thereby enhancing the release of hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). The latter theory contends that exclusion of the proximal small intestine reduces or suppresses the secretion of anti-incretin hormones, leading to improvement of blood glucose control as a consequence In fact, increased GLP-1 plasma levels stimulate insulin secretion and suppress glucagon secretion, thereby improving glucose metabolism Recent studies have shown that improved intestinal gluconeogenesis may also be involved in the amelioration of glucose homoeostasis following RYGB. Although no large trials have specifically addressed the effects of bariatric surgery on the remission or reversal of type 2 diabetes independent of weight loss and/or caloric restriction. there are Sufficient data in the literature to support the idea that this type of surgery-specifically. RYGB and BPD-can lead to early improvement of glucose control independent of weight loss (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据