4.6 Article

Efficacy of periodontal treatment on glycaemic control in diabetic patients: A meta-analysis of interventional studies

期刊

DIABETES & METABOLISM
卷 34, 期 5, 页码 497-506

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.03.006

关键词

Diabetes; Metabolic control; Glycated haemoglobin; Periodontal disease; Periodontitis; Meta-analysis; Interventional studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim. - There is growing evidence that periodontal disease may favour the incidence or aggravation of diabetes and its complications. To investigate the issue, we conducted a meta-analysis of the effect of periodontal therapy on glycaemic control in diabetic patients. Methods. - A literature search was carried Out using seven databases (Medline, EMBASE, LILACS, The Cochrane Library, Pascal, IADR Abstracts and Current Contents), with no language restrictions. We followed the QUOROM-recommended standards for improving the quality of reporting meta-analyses of interventional studies. Results. - Twenty-five studies, involving 976 subjects if together, were included in the present systematic review. Of these, nine Studies, involving a total of 485 patients, were controlled trials and were included in the meta-analysis. The standardized mean difference in HbA(1c) with the treatment of periodontal disease was 0.46 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.82). These findings suggest that periodontal treatment could lead to a significant 0.79% (95% CI: 0.19, 1.40) reduction in HbA(1c) level. Conclusion. - The present meta-analysis represents the best information available to date that addresses this issue, and suggests that periodontal treatment could improve glycaemic control. Nevertheless, these results need to be viewed with caution because of a lack of robustness, and deficiencies in the design of some of the studies included. A randomized controlled trial with sufficient statistical power would help to confirm the results of this meta-analysis. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据