4.7 Article

GATA4 Mutations Are a Cause of Neonatal and Childhood-Onset Diabetes

期刊

DIABETES
卷 63, 期 8, 页码 2888-2894

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db14-0061

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Community [FP7-PEOPLE-ITN-2008, 223211]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2011-27086]
  3. Diabetes UK [11/0004193]
  4. Wellcome TrustNational Institute for Health Research
  5. National Science Center, Poland (NCN) [2011/01/M/NZ5/02815]
  6. Innovative Economy Operational Programme-Activity 1.2 (the TEAM Programme coordinated by the Foundation for Polish Science)
  7. Diabetes UK [11/0004193] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10219] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The GATA family zinc finger transcription factors GATA4 and GATA6 are known to play important roles in the development of the pancreas. In mice, both Gata4 and Gata6 are required for pancreatic development. In humans, GATA6 haploinsufficiency can cause pancreatic agenesis and heart defects. Congenital heart defects also are common in patients with GATA4 mutations and deletions, but the role of GATA4 in the developing human pancreas is unproven. We report five patients with deletions (n = 4) or mutations of the GATA4 gene who have diabetes and a variable exocrine phenotype. In four cases, diabetes presented in the neonatal period (age at diagnosis 1-7 days). A de novo GATA4 missense mutation (p.N273K) was identified in a patient with complete absence of the pancreas confirmed at postmortem. This mutation affects a highly conserved residue located in the second zinc finger domain of the GATA4 protein. In vitro studies showed reduced DNA binding and transactivational activity of the mutant protein. We show that GATA4 mutations/deletions are a cause of neonatal or childhood-onset diabetes with or without exocrine insufficiency. These results confirm a role for GATA4 in normal development of the human pancreas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据