4.7 Article

The Histone Acetylase Activator Pentadecylidenemalonate 1b Rescues Proliferation and Differentiation in the Human Cardiac Mesenchymal Cells of Type 2 Diabetic Patients

期刊

DIABETES
卷 63, 期 6, 页码 2132-2147

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db13-0731

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health
  2. Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research [FIRB-MIUR RBFR10URHP, FIRB-MIUR RBFR087JMZ, PRIN2010-TYCL9B_006]
  3. LOEWE-CGT Centre of Excellence, Wolfgang Goethe University
  4. LOEWE-CGT [III L4 517/17004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the diabetes-associated alterations present in cardiac mesenchymal cells (CMSC) obtained from normoglycemic (ND-CMSC) and type 2 diabetic patients (D-CMSC), identifying the histone acetylase (HAT) activator pentadecylidenemalonate 1b (SPV106) as a potential pharmacological intervention to restore cellular function. D-CMSC were characterized by a reduced proliferation rate, diminished phosphorylation at histone H3 serine 10 (H3S10P), decreased differentiation potential, and premature cellular senescence. A global histone code profiling of D-CMSC revealed that acetylation on histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9Ac) and lysine 14 (H3K14Ac) was decreased, whereas the trimethylation of H3K9Ac and lysine 27 significantly increased. These observations were paralleled by a downregulation of the GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNAT) p300/CBP-associated factor and its isoform 5-alpha general control of amino acid synthesis (GCN5a), determining a relative decrease in total HAT activity. DNA CpG island hypermethylation was detected at promoters of genes involved in cell growth control and genomic stability. Remarkably, treatment with the GNAT proactivator SPV106 restored normal levels of H3K9Ac and H3K14Ac, reduced DNA CpG hypermethylation, and recovered D-CMSC proliferation and differentiation. These results suggest that epigenetic interventions may reverse alterations in human CMSC obtained from diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据