4.7 Article

Role of Transcription Factor Acetylation in Diabetic Kidney Disease

期刊

DIABETES
卷 63, 期 7, 页码 2440-2453

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db13-1810

关键词

-

资金

  1. VA Merit Award [1I01BX000345]
  2. 973 fund [2012CB517601]
  3. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01-DK-078897, 1R01-DK-088541]
  4. NIH [5K08-DK-082760, R01-HG-004508, R01-CA-87658]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Investigators [1999-30901944]
  6. Shanghai Bureau of Health for Young Investigators [2011-XYQ2011059]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) play a critical role in diabetic nephropathy (DN). Sirtuin-1 (SIRT1) regulates transcriptional activation of target genes through protein deacetylation. Here, we determined the roles of Sirt1 and the effect of NF-kappa B (p65) and STAT3 acetylation in DN. We found that acetylation of p65 and STAT3 was increased in both mouse and human diabetic kidneys. In human podocytes, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) induced p65 and STAT3 acetylation and overexpression of acetylation-incompetent mutants of p65 and STAT3 abrogated AGE-induced expression of NF-kappa B and STAT3 target genes. Inhibition of AGE formation in db/db mice by pyridoxamine treatment attenuated proteinuria and podocyte injury, restored SIRT1 expression, and reduced p65 and STAT3 acetylation. Diabetic db/db mice with conditional deletion of SIRT1 in podocytes developed more proteinuria, kidney injury, and acetylation of p65 and STAT3 compared with db/db mice without SIRT1 deletion. Treatment of db/db mice with a bromodomain and extraterminal (BET)-specific bromodomain inhibitor (MS417) which blocks acetylation-mediated association of p65 and STAT3 with BET proteins, attenuated proteinuria, and kidney injury. Our findings strongly support a critical role for p65 and STAT3 acetylation in DN. Targeting protein acetylation could be a potential new therapy for DN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据