4.7 Article

Development of the Human Pancreas From Foregut to Endocrine Commitment

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 10, 页码 3514-3522

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db12-1479

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kerkut Trust
  2. Innovation Grant from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  3. Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  4. Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund [WT097820MF]
  5. MRC [G1100420, MR/J003352/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [973891, MR/J003352/1, G1100420] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Knowledge of human pancreas development underpins our interpretation and exploitation of human pluripotent stem cell (PSC) differentiation toward a -cell fate. However, almost no information exists on the early events of human pancreatic specification in the distal foregut, bud formation, and early development. Here, we have studied the expression profiles of key lineage-specific markers to understand differentiation and morphogenetic events during human pancreas development. The notochord was adjacent to the dorsal foregut endoderm during the fourth week of development before pancreatic duodenal homeobox-1 detection. In contrast to the published data from mouse embryos, during human pancreas development, we detected only a single-phase of Neurogenin 3 (NEUROG3) expression and endocrine differentiation from approximately 8 weeks, before which Nirenberg and Kim homeobox 2.2 (NKX2.2) was not observed in the pancreatic progenitor cell population. In addition to revealing a number of disparities in timing between human and mouse development, these data, directly assembled from human tissue, allow combinations of transcription factors to define sequential stages and differentiating pancreatic cell types. The data are anticipated to provide a useful reference point for stem cell researchers looking to differentiate human PSCs in vitro toward the pancreatic -cell so as to model human development or enable drug discovery and potential cell therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据