4.7 Article

PKC delta Impaired Vessel Formation and Angiogenic Factor Expression in Diabetic Ischemic Limbs

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 8, 页码 2948-2957

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db12-1432

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Diabetes Association
  2. Fonds de Recherche de Quebec-Sante
  3. Diabete Quebec
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec-Sante
  5. Canadian Research Chair in Vascular Complications of Diabetes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decreased collateral vessel formation in diabetic peripheral limbs is characterized by abnormalities of the angiogenic response to ischemia. Hyperglycemia is known to activate protein kinase C (PKC), affecting the expression and activity of growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). The current study investigates the role of PKC delta in diabetes-induced poor collateral vessel formation and inhibition of angiogenic factors expression and actions. Ischemic adductor muscles of diabetic Prkcd(+/+) mice exhibited reduced blood reperfusion, vascular density, and number of small vessels compared with nondiabetic Prkcd(+/+) mice. By contrast, diabetic Prkcd(-/-) mice showed significant increased blood flow, capillary density, and number of capillaries. Although expression of various PKC isoforms was unchanged, activation of PKC delta was increased in diabetic Prkcd(+/+) mice. VEGF and PDGF mRNA and protein expression were decreased in the muscles of diabetic Prkcd(+/+) mice and were normalized in diabetic Prkcd(-/-) mice. Furthermore, phosphorylation of VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and PDGF receptor-beta (PDGFR-beta) were blunted in diabetic Prkcd(-/-) mice but elevated in diabetic Prkcd(-/-) mice. The inhibition of VEGFR2 and PDGFR-beta activity was associated with increased SHP-1 expression. In conclusion, our data have uncovered the mechanisms by which PKC delta activation induced poor collateral vessel formation, offering potential novel targets to regulate angiogenesis therapeutically in diabetic patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据