4.7 Article

Cytoplasmic-Nuclear Trafficking of G1/S Cell Cycle Molecules and Adult Human 13-Cell Replication A Revised Model of Human β-Cell G1/S Control

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 7, 页码 2460-2470

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db12-0778

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  2. Beta Cell Biology Consortium through National Institutes of Health [U-01 DK 089538, R-01 DK55023, R56 DK065149, T32-07052]
  3. Juvenile Diabetes Research Fund [1-2008-39, 34-2008-630]
  4. American Diabetes Association [7-12-BS-046]
  5. University of Pittsburgh Junior Faculty Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Harnessing control of human beta-cell proliferation has proven frustratingly difficult Most G1/S control molecules, generally presumed to be nuclear proteins in the human beta-cell, are in fact constrained to the cytoplasm. Here, we asked whether G1/S molecules might traffic into and out of the cytoplasmic compartment in association with activation of cell cycle progression. Cdk6 and cyclin D3 were used to drive human beta-cell proliferation and promptly translocated into the nucleus in association with proliferation. In contrast, the cell cycle inhibitors p15, p18, and p19 did not alter their location, remaining cytoplasmic. Conversely, p16, p21, and p27 increased their nuclear frequency. In contrast once again, p57 decreased its nuclear frequency. Whereas proliferating beta-cells contained nuclear cyclin D3 and cdk6, proliferation generally did not occur in beta-cells that contained nuclear cell cycle inhibitors, except p21. Dynamic cytoplasmic-nuclear trafficking of cdk6 was confirmed using green fluorescent protein tagged cdk6 and live cell imaging. Thus, we provide novel working models describing the control of cell cycle progression in the human beta-cell. In addition to known obstacles to beta-cell proliferation, cytoplasmic-to-nuclear trafficking of G1/S molecules may represent an obstacle as well as a therapeutic opportunity for human beta-cell expansion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据