4.7 Article

Rhein Protects Pancreatic β-Cells From Dynamin-Related Protein-1-Mediated Mitochondrial Fission and Cell Apoptosis Under Hyperglycemia

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 11, 页码 3927-3935

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db13-0251

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB517603]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30988003, 30890044, 30800946, 30871019, 31071232, 31000323, 90608010, 90813035]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rhein, an anthraquinone compound isolated from rhubarb, has been shown to improve glucose metabolism disorders in diabetic mice. The mechanism underlying the protective effect of rhein, however, remains unknown. Here, we demonstrate that rhein can protect the pancreatic -cells against hyperglycemia-induced cell apoptosis through stabilizing mitochondrial morphology. Oral administration of rhein for 8 or 16 weeks in db/db mice significantly reduced fasting blood glucose (FBG) level and improved glucose tolerance. Cell apoptosis assay using both pancreatic sections and cultured pancreatic -cells indicated that rhein strongly inhibited -cell apoptosis. Morphological study showed that rhein was mainly localized at -cell mitochondria and rhein could preserve mitochondrial ultrastructure by abolishing hyperglycemia-induced mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) expression. Western blot and functional analysis confirmed that rhein protected the pancreatic -cells against hyperglycemia-induced apoptosis via suppressing mitochondrial Drp1 level. Finally, mechanistic study further suggested that decreased Drp1 level by rhein might be due to its effect on reducing cellular reactive oxygen species. Taken together, our study demonstrates for the first time that rhein can serve as a novel therapeutic agent for hyperglycemia treatment and rhein protects pancreatic -cells from apoptosis by blocking the hyperglycemia-induced Drp1 expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据