4.7 Article

Islet β-Cell Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Precedes the Onset of Type 1 Diabetes in the Nonobese Diabetic Mouse Model

期刊

DIABETES
卷 61, 期 4, 页码 818-827

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db11-1293

关键词

-

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF)
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 DK083583, T32 DK065549]
  3. Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NIH) [UL1 RR025761]
  4. Takeda-American Diabetes Association
  5. American Heart Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type 1 diabetes is preceded by islet beta-cell dysfunction, but the mechanisms leading to beta-cell dysfunction have not been rigorously studied. Because immune cell infiltration occurs prior to overt diabetes, we hypothesized that activation of inflammatory cascades and appearance of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in beta-cell contributes to insulin secretory defects. Prediabetic nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice and control diabetes-resistant NOD-SCID and CD1 strains were studied for metabolic control and islet function and gene regulation. Prediabetic NOD mice were relatively glucose intolerant and had defective insulin secretion with elevated proinsulin:insulin ratios compared with control strains. Isolated islets from NOD mice displayed age-dependent increases in parameters of ER stress, morphologic alterations in ER structure by electron microscopy, and activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) target genes. Upon exposure to a mixture of proinflammatory cytokines that mimics the microenvironment of type 1 diabetes, MING beta-cells displayed evidence for polyribosomal runoff, a finding consistent with the translational initiation blockade characteristic of ER stress. We conclude that beta-cells of prediabetic NOD mice display dysfunction and overt ER stress that may be driven by NF-kappa B signaling, and strategies that attenuate pathways leading to ER stress may preserve beta-cell function in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 61:818-827, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据