4.7 Article

G6PC2: A Negative Regulator of Basal Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Secretion

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 1547-1556

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db12-1067

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vanderbilt Molecular Endocrinology Training Program Grant [5T32 DK-07563]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [DK-081666, DK-20593]
  3. NIH [R56-DK-052068, DK-043748, DK-078188, DK-060667, P60 DK-20593, DK-59637, DK-92589]
  4. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Autoimmunity Prevention Center grant
  5. Barbara Davis Center Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center [P30 DK-57516]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated fasting blood glucose (FBG) is associated with increased risk for the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular-associated mortality. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have linked polymorphisms in G6PC2 with variations in FBG and body fat, although not insulin sensitivity or glucose tolerance. G6PC2 encodes an islet-specific, endoplasmic reticulum resident glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit. A combination of in situ perfused pancreas, in vitro isolated islet, and in vivo analyses were used to explore the function of G6pc2 in mice. G6pc2 deletion had little effect on insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, whereas body fat was reduced in female G6pc2 knockout (KO) mice on both a chow and high-fat diet, observations that are all consistent with human GWAS data. G6pc2 deletion resulted in a leftward shift in the dose-response curve for glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS). As a consequence, under fasting conditions in which plasma insulin levels were identical, blood glucose levels were reduced in G6pc2 KO mice, again consistent with human GWAS data. Glucose-6-phosphatase activity was reduced, whereas basal cytoplasmic calcium levels were elevated in islets isolated from G6pc2 KO mice. These data suggest that G6pc2 represents a novel, negative regulator of basal GSIS that acts by hydrolyzing glucose-6-phosphate, thereby reducing glycolytic flux. Diabetes 62:1547-1556, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据