4.7 Article

The Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Controls Circadian Energy Metabolism and Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity

期刊

DIABETES
卷 62, 期 4, 页码 1102-1108

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db12-0507

关键词

-

资金

  1. TI Pharma (TIP project) [T2-105]
  2. Netherlands Heart Foundation (NHS project) [2007B81]
  3. Dutch Diabetes Research Foundation (DFN project) [2007.00.010]
  4. Netherlands Consortium for Systems Biology (NCSB project)
  5. The Netherlands Genomics Initiative/Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NGI/NWO), NWO ZonMW [81802016, 91207036]
  6. Dutch Organization for Scientific Research [90700195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disturbances in the circadian system are associated with the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Here, we studied the direct contribution of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the central pacemaker in the circadian system, in the development of insulin resistance. Exclusive bilateral SCN lesions in male C57Bl/6J mice, as verified by immunochemistry, showed a small but significant increase in body weight (+17%), which was accounted for by an increase in fat mass. In contrast, mice with collateral damage to the ventromedial hypothalamus and paraventricular nucleus showed severe obesity and insulin resistance. Mice with exclusive SCN ablation revealed a loss of circadian rhythm in activity, oxygen consumption, and food intake. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp analysis 8 weeks after lesioning showed that the glucose infusion rate was significantly lower in SCN lesioned mice compared with sham-operated mice (-63%). Although insulin potently inhibited endogenous glucose production (-84%), this was greatly reduced in SCN lesioned mice (-7%), indicating severe hepatic insulin resistance. Our data show that SCN malfunctioning plays an important role in the disturbance of energy balance and suggest that an absence of central clock activity, in a genetically intact animal, may lead to the development of insulin resistance. Diabetes 62:1102-1108, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据