4.7 Article

Intrinsic Differences in Adipocyte Precursor Cells From Different White Fat Depots

期刊

DIABETES
卷 61, 期 7, 页码 1691-1699

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db11-1753

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-DK-082659]
  2. Mary K. Iacocca Professorship
  3. Joslin Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center Core Laboratories [DK-036836]
  4. Pew Latin American Fellows Program in the Biological Sciences
  5. Mentor-Based American Diabetes Association Grant Award
  6. Mexican Council of Science (CONACyT) Postdoctoral Fellowship
  7. Loveman Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Obesity and body fat distribution are important risk factors for the development of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Evidence has accumulated that this risk is related to intrinsic differences in behavior of adipocytes in different fat depots. In the current study, we demonstrate that adipocyte precursor cells (APCs) isolated from visceral and subcutaneous white adipose depots of mice have distinct patterns of gene expression, differentiation potential, and response to environmental and genetic influences. APCs derived from subcutaneous fat differentiate well in the presence of classical induction cocktail, whereas those from visceral fat differentiate poorly but can be induced to differentiate by addition of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-2 or BMP-4. This difference correlates with major differences in gene expression signature between subcutaneous and visceral APCs. The number of APCs is higher in obesity-prone C57BL/6 mice than obesity-resistant 129 mice, and the number in both depots is increased by up to 270% by exposure of mice to high-fat diet. Thus, APCs from visceral and subcutaneous depots are dynamic populations, which have intrinsic differences hi gene expression, differentiation properties, and responses to environmental/genetic factors. Regulation of these populations may provide a new target for the treatment and prevention of obesity and its metabolic complications. Diabetes 61:1691-1699, 2012

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据