4.7 Article

C-peptide Response and HLA Genotypes in Subjects With Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes After Immunotherapy With DiaPep277 An Exploratory Study

期刊

DIABETES
卷 60, 期 11, 页码 3067-3072

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db10-0560

关键词

-

资金

  1. Centro Internazionale Studi Diabete, Italy
  2. Fondazione DEM, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE-To investigate whether lower risk HLA class II genotypes would influence the efficacy of DiaPep277 therapy in protecting beta-cell function evaluated by C-peptide secretion in recent-onset type I diabetic subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Data were collected from type 1 diabetic subjects enrolled in multicenter phase II studies with a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled design in whom fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels were measured. HLA genotypes were classified in high, moderate, and low risk categories. RESULTS-A total of 146 subjects (aged 4.3 to 58.5 years) were enrolled, including 76 children (<18 years old) and 70 adults. At baseline, there was a significant: increase in fasting, maximal, and area under the curve (AUC) C-peptide from high to moderate and low risk HLA genotypes in adults (P for trend <0.04) but not in children. Children showed a decrease of the three parameters over time regardless of therapy and HLA genotype. DiaPep277-treated adults with low risk genotype had significantly higher maximal and AUC C-peptide versus placebo at 12 months (0.04 +/- 0.07 vs. -0.28 +/- 1.09 P < 0.01, and 0.53 +/- 1.3 vs. -4.59 +/- 1.5 P < 0.05, respectively). In the moderate risk genotype group, Delta maximal and AUC C-peptide values were significantly higher in DiaPep277-treated versus placebo-treated patients (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS-This exploratory study demonstrates that type I diabetic adults with low and moderate risk HLA genotypes benefit the most from intervention with DiaPep277; the only subgroup with an increase of C-peptide at 12 months after diagnosis was the low risk DiaPep277-treated subgroup. Diabetes 60:3067-3072, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据